Screen against sanctions, PEP and adverse media.
Point-in-time screening and follow-up may support onboarding and ongoing review. Available lists, sources and monitoring frequency depend on the agreed scope.
- Financial services and fintech
- Compliance and MLRO teams
- High-trust marketplaces
- Any team under AML / KYC obligations
What it does
Right-sized list coverage
Coverage may include sanctions, politically exposed persons, adverse media or watchlists. Confirm the relevant jurisdictions, sources and update frequency for the service scope.
Context, not just a hit
A possible match should be reviewed in context and distinguished from a confirmed finding before a decision is made.
Ongoing monitoring
Re-screening or monitoring may be configured where supported. Frequency and coverage depend on the selected sources and service scope.
Defensible audit trail
Record the sources used and the resolution where this information is available for the requested check.
What this verifies
Evidence held together under one defensible record.
- Global sanctions (OFAC, UN, EU, UK)
- Local sanctions and watchlists
- Politically exposed persons (PEP)
- Adverse media
- Ongoing monitoring
- Ultimate beneficial ownership screening
How it works
- Step 01
Purpose and subject defined
Identify the subject, state the purpose and establish applicable consent or other authority for any individual checks.
- Step 02
Point-in-time screen
Run the agreed screen against the sources available for the requested scope and return possible matches for review.
- Step 03
Resolution
Possible matches can be reviewed against available identifiers and context. Unresolved or inconclusive items should remain distinct from confirmed matches.
- Step 04
Configure follow-up where available
Where monitoring is supported and configured, define the source coverage and review frequency.
Results and exceptions
What you receive
Depending on the agreed scope, the verification record may include request status, check-level findings and available supporting evidence in a report or other decision-ready output.
When evidence needs attention
Mismatches, incomplete information or unavailable sources may require clarification or review. An unresolved item should be distinguished from a confirmed result.
Verification layers used
These are shared layers of DPAVerify, combined as the request and evidence require.
Datapoint Intelligence
Risk screening and configured follow-up where supported by the agreed scope.
Learn moreDatapoint Verify
The identity and KYB record screening runs against.
Learn moreDatapoint Field
In-person confirmation when a hit calls for physical investigation.
Learn moreAccess and delivery
The available route depends on the solution, request scope and agreed operating model.
Related solutions
Pair this with another DPAVerify solution.
FAQ
Risk & Compliance: frequently asked questions
Coverage varies by jurisdiction and service scope. Ask Datapoint which sanctions, PEP, adverse-media or watchlist sources and update methods are available for your use case.
Re-screening or monitoring may be configured where the relevant sources support it. Confirm coverage, frequency and alert behaviour for the agreed scope.
Business, director or beneficial-ownership screening may be combined where relevant, subject to source availability and applicable authority for individual checks.
Compare possible matches with available identifiers and context. If a result cannot be resolved, record it as unresolved rather than treating it as a confirmed match or no-match.
Start a compliance screen
Screen the record — and keep screening it.
Describe the risk decision and we'll confirm relevant sources and available follow-up.
